Zen philosopher Masao Abe ONE BIRD WITH TWO WINGS Masao Abe (1915) speaks very deliberately. After a question silence reigns as the seconds tick by. During this interval he nods occasionally and he seems to be turning the question over and over in his mind. Once he begins to speak, the answer has been completely thought out from beginning to end. Masao Abe, Zen philosopher, is a great man in the world of Japanese philosophy. He is a member of the second generation of the Kyoto School, which, following the footsteps of Kitaro Nishida, is based on the principle of Absolute Nothingness. By Bart Brandsma (Translated by Rosemary Robson) The well-turned phrases he utters sometimes sound suspect. They resemble the caricature of eastern philosophy so often created in the west. Succinct statements as they are found in Zen -'ultimate reality is to be found in oneself'- have been confiscated by whole generations, first by hippies and the Beatles, later by the environmental movement social therapists, and after them by new-agers and commercial television stations. The famous book 'Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance?' sells just as well today as it did twenty years ago. Unmoved by the circus which has been created around it in Europe and the United States, Zen continues. In Japan Zen is not subject to the whims of fashion. In the Kyoto School, situated in Kyoto on the west coast of Japan, the study of philosophy is based completely on Zen. The Kyoto School is a blending of the two most important philosophical movements in Japan, where there is the 'traditional' school, which is principally concerned with learning from ancient texts and religious works, and studying the works of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. In contrast to this are the philosophers who have concentrated on the study of western philosophy, and, therefore, from an international perspective, have very little to offer which is 'specifically Japanese'. The Kyoto School steers a middle course: western thinking and Zen experience confront each other. Masao Abe demonstrates this, for instance, in his chef d'oeuvre which received the accolade of 'book of excellence' in the United States in 1989. 'JAPANESE PHILOSOPHY IS A BRIDGE BETWEEN EAST AND WEST' The subject of the Kyoto School is Zen. The basic task consists of finding a way to translate meditative Zen experiences into more lucid concepts and more clear cut theories. However, the Zen experience cannot be 'really' explained. The Zen experience hinges on that the fact a world view is 'realized'. A person is 'completely aware'. This is the reason that in the philosophical theory of the Kyoto School consciousness of the world, the Zen world image, is gradually broken down into smaller, more easily understandable parts and committed to paper in a transmissible, but extremely fragmented, theory. A BANK OF CLOUDS But, let there be no error: 'Meditation is not more important than thinking', says Masao Abe, and he illustrates this with an example: 'Both are important ingredients in the study of philosophy. Philosophy and experience: 'academic scholarship' and 'meditative exercises' are like the two wings of a bird. The bird cannot fly with only one wing. Pure scholarship, without meditation, is impotent. Whereas, exercises without learning make one blind. In Kyoto philosophy each is tied very firmly to the other'. As Masao Abe talks, his arms spread out wide over an imaginary bank of clouds. Who or what will be the beneficiaries? What is the aim of the Kyoto School? Abe refuses to be drawn about either the use or the social role of philosophy. Nor about Francis Fukuyama, for instance, -'Who is that? His name sounds Japanese.'- and he is not forthcoming about the future of ideological thought. Abe: 'Philosophy in Japan actually has a much greater range. Japanese philosophy is a bridge between east and west. Japan is introducing western philosophy to the east, while maintaining its traditional spirituality'. Masao Abe's own personal choice of philosophy was born from this relationship. His father was a modern doctor and his mother was completely devoted to Buddha. 'My mother was an impressive woman. I frequently saw her recite old texts. In her belief humans could be "saved", not through their own resources but through a great external power', says Abe. 'The condition for this salvation was an unconditional surrender'. Abe was affected by his mother's devotion at a very early age. 'I wanted to follow in her footsteps. But it was too difficult for me to renounce rational thought, to surrender myself to mercy. I decided to study philosophy'. As a young man of twenty or so Abe went to the Kyoto School. He decided to say farewell to the factory where he was then employed. 'I wanted to discover the limits of my rational thought'. At the Kyoto School he met Professor Shin'ichi Hisamatsu (1889-1980) - 'My lifelong mentor'. Hisamatsu introduced Abe to Zen. And ever since that time he has tried 'to qualify Zen in a comparison with Christian belief and western philosophy.' But the study all began with Kitaro Nishida. BASHO Kitaro Nishida (1870-1945), the pioneer of the comparative study between east and west, is the creator of a philosophy which is based on 'absolute nothingness'. Nishida used the German philosopher Fichte as his reference. In his theory Fichte, like Nishida, has the world begin in human experience. 'Experience does not come from the world, experience comes from me'. But, whereas Fichte wants to attribute the 'creative I' to a rational origin -Fichte's famous 'free will'-, Nishida prefers a mystical, intuitive origin. The I 'stands' in a mystical field and from here it experiences the world. This is the basis of the philosophy of 'basho' (place). The place, 'basho', is absolute nothingness: man stands alone, completely independent in the mysticism of an absolute nothingness. Referring to his own undertaking, Nishida writes: 'I switched from Fichte's free will to a sort of intuitivism'. As far as Nishida is concerned 'the dualistic way of looking at things' is relegated to second place. Dualism represents that way of thinking which divides the world into two: observer and observed, subject and object, idea and matter. Abe expatiates on the Kyoto master Nishida: 'Something must precede dualism. The dualistic vision presents a subject-object structure. There has to be a source from which this dualistic way of thinking 'emerges'. This source, which precedes duality, must be 'the ultimate or true reality'. Dualistic thought, moreover, is inextricably bound up with the human way of life', says Abe, 'and the division can never be 'solved'. The great appeal which Zen has in the west perhaps has its roots in the misconception that dualism can be permanently eliminated by Zen meditation. This is not so'. 'WITHOUT BEING THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE, WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE THERE IS NO BEING' Abe: 'One example of dualistic thought: the phrase 'a horse runs' is a subject-object judgement; the horse is viewed by man and in the judgement one single characteristic of the horse is highlighted: 'the running' is separated from the object. The subject, the human being, analyses and observes the object. Alongside this, there is also something else, namely the intuition: 'running horse', which is not encumbered by any judgement. This is the way in everything that we have to revert to the root of subject-object thinking'. Abe: 'The west is acquainted with the materialist and idealist movements. Ren‚ Descartes begins with the idea that 'the self' also forms the point of departure. He begins with the idea; the idealist. By contrast, the west is acquainted with the materialists, who begin their theory from the 'reality of the world'. Both options share a common supposition: that there is a division between subject and object. Thus argued Nishida.' What happens when the choice between materialism and idealism is nullified? Masao Abe realizes that this is when the western mind really encounters grave problems. 'In the west there is a clear cut division between ontology, the study of being, and epistemology, the study of the possibilities of knowledge', he explains. 'The problem of being is opposed to the problem of knowing'. Two different problems, it seems to me. 'This duality is accepted and it is rarely questioned.' MIND 'The next question following very quickly on its heels is: which comes first? Is being there because of our observation? Or do we observe because of the fact that things exist? Idealists cling to the primacy of knowing. Materialists maintain that being determines knowing. This sort of dualistic concept of knowing and being is dubious. Being and knowing are indivisible. Without being there is no knowing, without knowing there is no being. This is one of the most important points which the western mind finds difficult to grasp: that epistemology and ontology cannot be separated. The western mind cannot proceed beyond dualistic thought; to arrive at a non-dualistic concept.' 'If I'm not mistaken', says Abe in amazement, 'western philosophy is organized along purely rational lines. Therefore eastern philosophy is not considered to be philosophy. Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism are discussed as world religions, not as philosophies. As if they are not systems of thinking!' Who can fly with only one wing? Abe Masao, 'Zen and western thought', MacMillan, London/New York 1985, 308 p. Price œ42.50, ISBN 0.333.362.063 Abe Masao and Christopher Ives, 'Kitaro Nishida: an inquiry into the good', Yale University Press, London/New Haven 1990. 184 p. SOURCE: FILOSOFIE MAGAZINE, NR 5, JUNE/JULY 1994, PP 11-12