IIAS | IIAS Newsletter Online | No. 26 | Asian Art

 
THE GATE FOUNDATION IS AN INTERNATIONAL ART FOUNDATION DEVOTED TO PROMOTING INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE OF CONTEMPORARY ART.
THE GATE FOUNDATION AIMS TO STIMULATE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF CONTEMPORARY ART AND ARTISTS, EMPHASIZING NON-WESTERN AND MIGRANT CULTURES.

 

THE GATE FOUNDATION

Keizersgracht 613
1017 ds Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P.O. Box 814
1000 av Amsterdam
Tel: +31-20-620 80 57
Fax: +31-20-639 07 62

 

An interview with Manray Hsu

A Vision on Contemporary Taiwanese Art

Manray Hsu is an independent art critic and curator based in Taipei (Taiwan) who has acted as a co-curator of the Taipei Biennial 2000, 'The Sky is the Limit', that was held in the Taipei Fine Arts Museum. The Gate Foundation invited him to the Netherlands to give some lectures on contemporary Taiwanese art and artists. Somewhere in his schedule of appointments with a variety of curators and visits to different art centres and museums, we were able to meet on a terrace in the Amsterdam summer sun. It was an exceptionally hot day by Dutch standards. 'These temperatures are common in Taiwan, therefore children like to stay in the air-conditioned Seven Elevens and read comic books', Manray Hsu says with a smile.
 

* By SASKIA MONSHOUWER

The central issue of the interview is a complex one. What is the relationship between the regional specific Taiwanese identity, and the international art world? How can we deal with the current shift of political and cultural categorizations, and how do these changes reflect on modern and current art? These questions are well-nigh impossible to answer in the short period of time we have together, yet their answers not only determine Manray Hsu's broader philosophical vision on art, but also our personal confrontation, as they underlie every one of his remarks.
On the one hand, Manray Hsu acts as a kind of ambassador, carrying knowledge and images from Taiwan and representing his region. On the other, he seeks to represent a certain vision common in the international art world today. He believes in a new kind of art, an international one. A kind of art that can reflect thoughts and beliefs pronounced in post-modernist, philosophical texts and can be seen as an outcome of new communication technologies and processes, such as the development of a new economy and shifts in dependency relations.
'Can you still speak of typical Taiwanese art, in the sense of national Taiwanese art?' This is my first question, in an attempt to find a common name for the diversity of photographs of art works he carries with him. 'Nationalism cannot be dealt with systematically,' he answers, 'only nations tend to do so. From the point of view of the citizen, there are many possibilities. You can resist it; you can stay or leave and make all kinds of combinations.' The fact that Manray Hsu immediately changes the perspective of the question from an overview to a personal level appears crucial, and has a political and historical dimension.
In his introduction on Taiwanese art, he points to the fast and rigorous entry into modernity that Taiwan has made. This entrance is related to its political situation. Taipei, as we know it now is a crowded city buzzing with activity. People are generally busy and work all around the clock, Seven Elevens are on every corner, and children find themselves all kinds of toys made in Japan or the USA. Modern Taiwan has come into existence from the moment the KMT had been driven out of China by the Communist Party. The KMT then established a dictatorial regime and unconditionally focused its policies on economic production and international trade. For the development of modern art, the most important impulse has been the opening of the Taipei Fine Arts Museum in 1984.
The ambiguity that follows the changes of the past five decades is reflected in the name Manray Hsu proper: a chosen name and self- ¥IIASN26-P44-10 created identity. He chose the invented name of an artist who, as a child from Polish Jews in New York, stood at the roots of modern art. Manray Hsu seems to claim that the bedrock for modern and contemporary art in Taiwan can only be understood in the context of the political vulnerability of the country and its recent leap into modernity. The latter is well illustrated by the way he handles the photographs he carries with him. His laptop provides access to a large image-databank with images of artworks by several Taiwanese artists.
In addition, he makes snapshots of the city of Taipei and shows them so as to provide an introduction to contemporary art. He sees these snapshots as the vehicle of his mission, a tool in making people understand what current art is about. Manray Hsu emphasizes the present and provides an entry to contemporary art. The works of most contemporary Taiwanese artists contain elements from street scenes: a photograph of a shop window depicts colourful, plastic, Japanese and American products. Advertisements, comics, and new techniques constitute the theme and determine the motives in a variety of works of art. Subsequently, a view of art history is being defined. In a sense, the reconstruction of history in modern art parallels how people redefine their own identity. Reconstructing history, then, is the second underlying theme of current Taiwanese art. Tradition, politics, and world history are at the heart of this reconstruction.
In consequence of this starting point, questions about traditional Taiwanese art (or, in a wider context, about Chinese or Southeast Asian art) are not to be interpreted as a search for a chronological line in which the new develops from the old. Both the new and the old are creations, they are intellectual reflections. Thoughts on tradition are fluently combined with thoughts about the future. This perspective is strongly present in the works of the Taiwanese artists.
The works of Hongjohn Lin present many parallels to the thoughts of Manray Hsu. He earned his PhD in art history at the University of New York. In an installation of his in the Japanese garden of the Metropolitan Museum, he was living in this garden, dressed in traditional Japanese garments. In all of his works, Hongjohn Lin plays a subtle game with history and creates new and surprising views on cultural identity. After his studies, he returned to Taiwan, where he took to lecturing in photography, writing and making art. Another artist Manray Hsu often mentions is Hung Tunglu, who makes photographs of large robots. For those of you with children (and thus well acquainted with modern cartoons), they best resemble 'Transformers', huge robots composed of several smaller ones, which are, in proportion, larger than the tallest buildings in the city. They appear in the meadows in between colourful flowers as if poised to take over the world. In his pictures, Hung Tunglu creates new icons and symbols that are easily understood by a large range of people. Wan Jun-Jjieh, then, is an artist who works with modern media, confronting people with the strange self-created world we live in. At the Taipei Biennial 2000, he presented a virtual travel agency. A space in the museum marked with pink plastic palm trees. Visitors were invited to use computers and send e-mails across the world. Only one artist Maray Hsu mentioned makes art that is explicitly related to Taoist tradition. Lee Ming Wei made a museum architectural space, where he would cook and invite people to eat with him. In the white and rectangular surroundings he interviews his guests.
It would be wrong to conclude from these examples that you might be able to distill out Manray Hsu's personal preferences. He has an open view and is well aware of the danger of using works of art as illustration to an intellectual vision. The diversity of art and artists confirms this. When asked about his selection criteria, he points out that it is all about quality, but the underlying thoughts and analyses are clear.
'People are products of their time, but only some become faces that tell what art is. These are the people that face up their historical situation with great sensitivity. With the advent of industrial revolution, time changes faster than before' so he proclaimed in 1999 in a text published in the catalogue to the exhibition 'Face to Face', a presentation of contemporary Taiwanese art in the Gold Coast City Art Gallery in Australia.
But in spite of his international goals and aims, in spite of his visionary beliefs in a new international art, most of the questions asked by the public concern the specific Taiwanese situation. They ask him to specify both the regional differences of a pronounced Taiwanese identity from a semi-traditional perspective and the way this identity directs the production of current art in Taiwan. There is, of course, nothing wrong with this curiosity, as long as it steers clear from transparent categorizations of the exotic (that does not even exist in the end) or more vicious ethnocentric beliefs.
Through looking at Taiwanese art, as presented by Manray Hsu, it becomes very clear how daring it is to find the route to a new kind of art. The political and historical lines are evidence of the need to research and recreate an identity. *

About Manray Hsu:
Dr Manray Hsu has a PhD Candidate in Aesthetics from the Department of Philosophy at Columbia University, New York and is a regular contributor to Art Asia-Pacific, Flash Art and major magazines in China.
 
 
AMONG HIS EXHIBITIONS ARE:
 
1997 'Back from Home', bamboo Curtain Studio, Taipei
1998 'Thing-Made Things', IT, Taipei
1999 Exhibition of Chiang Hsiou-chien and Hasia Yin: 'Two Youngest Artists in History', Hua-shan Cultural district, Taipei (in cooperation with. Ralf Schmitt)
2000 'Frogansters': Group exhibition of an indefinite Number of Frogs, 'About Café','Bangkok, Cities on the Move', H.M.L. Art Beatus Gallery, Vancouver
2000 Taipei Biennial, 'The Sky is the limit' (co-curator with Jerome Sans)
 

 


Saskia Monshouwer is an art critic and publicist working for the GATE Foundation. She is a regular contributor to 'Kunstbeeld', a Dutch art magazine.

   IIAS | IIAS Newsletter Online | No. 26 | Asian Arts