IIAS | IIAS Newsletter Online | No. 16 | Institutes
The ESF Programme in Asian StudiesIn Autumn 1997, the European Science Foundation decided to continue its programme in Asian Studies for another three-year period. Launched officially in 1995 and reviewed in 1997, this programme will continue to address research topics considered relevant to the relationship between Asia and Europe. It will in particular encourage disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences so as to study developments in contemporary Asia against their cultural and historical backgrounds. The most important goal of this programme is to acquire a better knowledge of developments in Asian countries and cultures and, to achieve this purpose, to strengthen the European research community dealing with Asia.By Max SparreboomIn a recent strategy paper (1997), the Asia Committee, which was in charge of the Asian Studies programme during the past three years, presented a view across the field of Asian Studies, giving a broad indication of the issues that should be addressed in the future. Besides this, an external review panel has evaluated the work done in the first three years and made suggestions to the ESF for future activities, pointing out among other recommendations that more emphasis should be placed on contemporary issues of cultural, scientific, economic, and political relevance. The ESF Standing Committees for the Humanities and the Social Sciences endorsed the views expressed by the reviewers. The Asia Committee was asked to present three items: a statement on the research topics it was planning to address, a research prospectus serving as a mission statement, and a guide to the work of the second three-year period. This document aims to fulfil that purpose. Practical aspects of the Asia Committee's work, such as issues of membership, modes of operation and reporting arrangements, are dealt with elsewhere (arrangements for the second mandate period of the ESF Asia Committee, September 1997) and are not repeated here. The following sectionss focus on the academic themes at issue. The themes chosen are broad and general enough to allow creative and individual approaches to the topics from the work floor, on the other hand the themes are sufficiently specific for researchers and research councils to recognize an academic agenda of work to which researchers in the Social Sciences and the Humanities can contribute. Although most themes fall within these two fields, there are important connections to other disciplinary domains such as the Technical and Life Sciences. In the strategy paper, interdisciplinary approaches are labelled a strength of European research on Asia. Where useful, and if possible, such interdisciplinary co-operation will be pursued, but the choice of topics implies that, where these prove adequate, there is also room for mono and multi-disciplinary approaches. Throughout the range of subjects the idea is that researchers from Europe and Asia work together on topics of common concern.The central issue in the topics enumerated below is the regional shaping of globalization and its interaction with regional and local identities. In the West globalization is perceived largely as a process of Westernization, but is that what it is? What effect does this globalization have on the economies, on the political organization of the regions, on demography, and on the lives and cultures of minority groups? Another thread running through all the issues is the necessity to compare the European and the Asian perspectives and experiences. Whether this is in the area of state-building, management of the environment, or financial markets, the comparative aspect is of interest to researchers, politicians, and companies in both Asia and Europe. The selection of issues is therefore determined by considerations of European added-value and relevance to the understanding of developments in contemporary Asia. Historically, East and Southeast Asian societies have been more egalitarian than often assumed, especially when compared with their counterparts in Africa and Latin America. Informal ways and means have developed to spread incomes and resources through patronage, kinship, village solidarity, and subtle restrictions on abuse of power. These age-old systems have now changed as a result of the rapid growth of Asian economies, resulting in the rise of new middle classes and new patterns of consumption. It is, however, a fairly small segment of the total population that has so far benefited from the expanding economy. Poverty has decreased, but since the beginning of the 1990s this decline has come to a halt or has even been reversed. The on-going process of privatisation implies that state-driven systems of social security have not shared in the expansion. On the contrary, the formal sector of the economy, with the concomitant security of employment and social provisions, seems to be decreasing rather than increasing. The costs of health, education, and housing have gone up. The absence of formal schemes of social security is particularly frightening for the very large segment of the work-force, both rural and urban, which has to survive on low wages. Informal systems of social security, based on kinship, religious, or localized networks are no longer operative. This problem, the decline of the formal sector, coinciding with the breaking up of local networks, needs to be tackled. Asian cities are growing in size and population numbers at an unprecedented rate. Whereas in 1950 one in six Asians lived in cities, by the year 2000 it will be one in three; and while in 1950 most of the million cities were found in Europe and North America, at the end of this century most mega-cities (with over 10 million inhabitants) will be in Asia, including Tokyo-Yokohama, Shanghai, Bombay, Jakarta, and Manila. Net immigration from rural areas has usually been a greater contributor to urban growth than natural increase. The opportunities Asian cities offer to its residents are different. Many rural migrants find it difficult to make a living in poorly paid and uncertain industrial jobs or the self-employed informal sector, but, in contrast, businessmen and professionals can afford a luxurious life. In lay-out and architecture the cities both follow global trends and yet have various indigenous Asian models based on old traditions. The competition for resources such as oil, gas, water, and wood takes on new forms in the face of the predicted population growth in some areas, notably China. Examples are the problems in the South China Sea and the investments of big companies in Central Asia or in Irian Jaya. Another example is the Japanese policy of monopolizing Southeast Asian markets and securing its trade. Asia looks rather askance at Europe with its long history of forming and breaking regional political, economic, and military alliances. What will be the future role of organizations such as ASEAN and SAARC (not to mention APEC and ASEM)? By what kind of regional agreements is stability and security served best? Asia is the birthplace of a number of world religions and value-systems such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Taoism and Confucianism. Religions and value-systems from the West are also widely spread in Asia. The co-existence of these systems has been unproblematic in many instances but there have also been violent clashes between adherents of the different creeds, especially between Hindus and Muslims. A range of research questions relevant to present day society can be formulated on the basis of this. One of the effects of the trend towards globalization is a rapid change in labour relationships. The basic question here is whether the Asian countries have chosen or will choose trajectories similar to or different from the Western economies. At a macro-level the debate has focused on the East Asian countries. But the cultural and religious contexts in the different regions are very diverse, giving rise to different trajectories in the global market, currently under severe pressure from global financial institutions and the ever more transnationalized large companies. This theme focuses on the role that East-West relations play in global environmental issues. What is the structure and content of environmental relations between Asia and Europe / North America, and what are their impacts on the global ecosystem? How are global environmental issues affected by -- and in turn affect -- relations between Asia and Europe/North America? Over-exploitation of natural resources threatens global biodiversity. It has forced millions of people to leave their homelands, creating a new category of environmental refugees. And it is increasingly responsible for political conflicts. Many of these problems are transnational in origin and are especially acute in Asia. For example, some of the most important marketers of tropical timbers, and defenders of the trade, are found in Southeast Asia; whereas some of the most important timber consumers, and critics of the trade, are found in Europe and North America. In these and other issues, the most strident disagreements are those between the nations of Asia and Europe/North America. These environmental issues not only impact both East and West, they are constituted as issues by East-West relations. Topics to be addressed are: 1) the political-economic study of the international trade and industry for East-West environmental relations, the role of international aid agencies and bankers in these relations, East-West green marketing and eco-tourism; 2) how do ideas about nature and environment flow between East and West? How is environmental and political legitimacy created? What is the role of indigenous knowledge versus modern science?; 3) the study of natural resource management and conservation, the relations between gender and the environment and the quality of urban life and 4, the comparative cross-cultural study of perceptions of nature and cultural constructs of environmental danger and sustainability. Industrial development never proceeds independently of its specific institutional and historical context. That is as true of Asian industrialization as it was true for industrial development experiences in Europe. Therefore, no 'normal' pattern of industrial accumulation is given. Instead, the challenge is to identify a multitude of industrial pathways or trajectories, each of which is embedded in the national socio-cultural and socio-political context. By means of comparative analysis it is possible to come up with generalizations about the relationships between policies, selected institutions, and development patterns and specify the conditions under which these bounded generalisations are valid. The overriding aim would be to acquire a better and more systematic understanding of the interaction between the institutional frameworks for policy formulation and implementation and economic growth and the various patterns of industrial transformation or stagnation observed in the Asian high and lower-performing economies. A long-term perspective will be necessary to grasp the significance of the various types of state-led and market-led industrialization strategies that are pursued. It would be of particular interest to focus on the political and institutional preconditions for the sustained high growth rates in some of the East and Southeast Asian countries and compare these with the conditions obtaining and the results achieved in other countries such as India. The types and modes of government intervention are indubitably worth considering. Developments in China would need to be treated as a special case in this context. With the recent difficulties faced by several of the high-performing Asian economies, the research agenda is likely to shift from the macro-economic policy framework and the general institutional arrangements for policy implementation to a special consideration of the role of the financial markets and the institutions and other factors affecting capital flows. There are lessons to be learned for other Asian countries from both the past successes of the high-performing economies and from the financial crises these countries have recently faced. Pertinently, studies of the global repercussions of past growth and present crises in parts of Asia are likely to reveal basic features of international economic and financial processes which also impact upon the European economies. During what has been called 'the third wave of democratization', plural liberal polities have been established in many parts of Southern and Eastern Europe, Africa, and Latin America. But only few gains have been made by the liberal ideas in Asia. Constitutional democracy prevails in Japan and India. South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines and Thailand have established, or re-established, multi-party systems and reasonably free elections, but their political systems leave much to be desired in terms of transparency and division of powers, before they can be classified as democracies in the Western sense. Demands for more political openness have been suppressed by force, most notably in China, Indonesia, Burma, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. Singapore and Malaysia have authoritarian political systems with rigid restrictions on the party system and elections have up to now been largely ritual. From a Western perspective, Asia is the least democratic of the world's six continents. In Asia there has been an intensive discussion, reinforced by the current financial crisis, on the applicability of Western models of democracy. In many quarters, there has been a rejection of these in favour of Asian versions of governance and human rights, built on the community rather than the individual, on consensus rather than opposition, on strong government rather than pluralism and decentralization. These ideas and visions have been promoted through various avenues, including the joint Asian declaration at the Vienna conference, the Bangkok declaration, and the Committee for a New Asia. A new Asia Committee will be constituted for the execution of the research agenda outlined above. The Research Organizations which are member of the European Science Foundation, have been approached with a request to nominate scholars for this Committee. These organizations are also being asked to contribute financially to the work of the Committee from 1999 onwards. The budget targetted for the coming three years amounts to FF 2,940,000 per year. Countries which did not participate fully or contribute financially in the previous mandate period (Italy, Spain, Portugal, East European countries), are also being approached for participation. The budget will be spent on programme development, by providing short-term grants for pilot studies; on international workshops and on other activities, to be decided by the new Asia Committee. Hopefully the renewed Asia Committee can start work in October-November this year. Further announcements will be published in the next issues of this Newsletter. |
   IIAS | IIAS Newsletter Online | No. 16 | Institutes